American Democracy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

American Democracy - Essay Example To ensure, however, that tendencies toward despotic rule being entitled as well to a right as such are not tolerated, ‘Madisonian’ democracy prioritizes power of the majority to restrain any political behavior that eventually leads to concentration on self-interests by the body of authority. Necessitating for each American citizen to acquire proper education by right rather than privilege is one tradition which gives evidence to the application of Madisonian concept. In this setting, the government engages in full support of fair academic provisions across citizenry through institutions where learning individuals acknowledge the assistance granted. This, in return, enables the latter to realize a sense of responsibility by taking care to accomplish conscientious studies in pursuit of careers that would serve the interest of fellow Americans besides that of oneself. American democratic processes, moreover, may be envisioned to abide by the belief of Madisonian democracy h aving considered the existence of cooperative federalism. Accepting a system of federal governance designed to summon cooperation within various levels of government for supreme advantage that affects the collaborating states involved is such a picture of ideal democracy which the Civil Rights movement had yearned for at length. At a stage when stated-based societies are stratified into the three common social classes namely—upper class, middle class, and lower class, Civil Rights politics may be perceived with respect to the goal of achieving equality of rights regardless of social differentiation. Based on the proposition by the American sociologist T. Parsons, â€Å"stability and order, in part, depend upon a universal value† which is likely to undergo transformation with the political movement in action. Consequently, since almost every U.S. civilian has been able to exercise the freedom of speech and to be distinct in thought and act, participation in Civil Rights protest, apparently, may come in various styles or modes of implementation. In which case, the movement bears the capacity to generate new set of principles which embed onto the older substance of Civil Rights. On the other hand, since the theoretically ideal approach of pluralism requires an acceptance of inequality under a generalized authority of central governments, then the democratic paths to Civil Rights can be altered with time and circumstances brought by social and political differences among people. This way, such differences manifest in competing interests within a marketplace of preferences that occur to be culturally diverse so that the most proactive individuals raise arguments, share intellects, and join forces with the objective of reshaping policies and terms within the society, the economy, and the politics altogether. The varying resources, as it turns out, gradually function to satisfy higher forms of advantage throughout the nation. Instead of productive arran gements nevertheless hyperpluralism, according to a general assessment on policymakers, proves to arrive typically at intricate policies that seem to lead their subjects to disillusionment. Being an exaggerated version of its pluralist counterpart, the rather pessimistic theory of hyperpluralism yields to a state of imbalance between powers of the government and the authorities granted to groups that have been tasked to remedy areas of conflict which are